The estimate is also shown to be asymptotically normal. The asymptotic variance of such an estimate is obtained. We can split the vertical scale into 5 equal probability ranges: 0-20%, 20-40%, …, 80-100%. Latin hypercube sampling (McKay, Conover, and Beckman 1979) is a method of sampling that can be used to produce input values for estimation of expectations of functions of output variables. Imagine we want to take 5 samples from this distribution. The vertical axis represents the probability that the variable will fall at or below the horizontal axis value. Probability distributions can be described by a cumulative curve, like the one below. It works by controlling the way that random samples are generated for a probability distribution. With this sampling type, RISK or RISKOptimizer divides the cumulative curve into equal intervals on the cumulative probability scale, then takes a random value from each interval of the input distribution. We are often asked why we don’t implement LHS in our ModelRisk software, since nearly all other Monte Carlo simulation applications do, so we thought it would be worthwhile to provide an explanation here. About Latin Hypercube sampling By contrast, Latin Hypercube sampling stratifies the input probability distributions. The sampling region is partitioned into a specific manner by dividing the range. LHS does not deserve a place in modern simulation software. The Latin Hypercube Sampling (LHS) is a type of stratified Monte Carlo (MC). However, desktop computers are now at least 1,000 times faster than the early 1980s, and the value of LHS has disappeared as a result. In the simulations for which results are presented here, the random topology contains 1000 entities each with 5 dependencies, the torus topology uses a 25 by 40 grid of 1000 entities, and the. It was, at the time, an appealing technique because it allowed one to obtain a stable output with a much smaller number of samples than simple Monte Carlo simulation, making simulation more practical with the computing tools available at the time. The technique dates back to 1980 (even though the manual describes LHS as “a new sampling technique”) when computers were very slow, the number of distributions in a model was extremely modest and simulations took hours or days to complete. It is a method for ensuring that each probability distribution in your model is evenly sampled which at first glance seems very appealing. The Meta21 model, beyond demonstrating the LHS approach to taking into account uncertainty, also has many components that can be readily integrated into global economic models that track greenhouse gas emissions-a simple climate module, economic impacts derived from sea-level and temperature rises and bio-physical tipping points such as the Amazon dieback.Most risk analysis simulation software products offer Latin Hypercube Sampling (LHS). This paper demonstrates the use of the new utility by coupling it to an integrated assessment (IAM) model which is derived from the Meta21 model developed by (Dietz et al., 2021). Beyond the recoding from FORTRAN to C/C++, the new version of the utility has some additional features including new output options and additional statistical distributions. The utility is a new version of the LHS utility that has been publicly available from Sandia National Labs since the early 2000s. The LHS approach to sampling has had wide applicability as it represents a Monte Carlo strategy that limits sample size and therefore computer time to study the outcomes of simulations under uncertainty. A hypercube simulation was taken as a benchmark mainly because of its symmetry. This paper describes the use of a utility that creates a Latin Hypercube Sample (LHS). It took seven minutes for the CMB simulation to finish a short simulation. On the other hand, although Rosenblueth’s 2 K + 1 point-estimate method is much simpler, it is not capable of capturing the important attributes of the distribution of either input or output variables. "Latin Hypercube Sampling for Sensitivity Analysis" The simulations show that the Latin hypercube method is an efficient alternative to the computationally intensive Monte Carlo technique.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |